Tuesday, February 7, 2017

Scientists in the 16th and 17th Centuries

Scientists and their head for the hills underwent an evolution equal to artists of the Renaissance, during the scientific Revolution of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Scientists such as Galileo Galilei, Nicolaus Copernicus, and Isaac newton proved to be important and revolutionary. The work of the aforementioned scientists was twain positively and negatively bear upon by the social, political, and religious factors of the time. During the 16th and 17th centuries, the church building had striking control over skill, curiously ideas that would oppose the teachings of the Bible. Copernicus was ostracized for his heliocentric model, and as a result in a later outcome Copernicus writes to pontiff Paul III, It is to your theology rather than to anyone else that I feed chosen to dedicate these studies of tap ( physician 1). Copernicus views the Pope as rattling powerful, therefore Copernicus writes this to gain the Popes support in order for his work to be more(pren ominal) successful. This depicts how the Catholic Church negatively asked these scientists because Copernicus had to settle the Pope to make trusted he was not attacked. ameliorate when scientists appeased to the Pope, local clergymen were even more aggressive in their attacks on scientists. As seen in Doc 3., Giovanni Ciampoli, an Italian monk, writes angrily to Galileo, It is indispensable, therefore, to unsay the possibility of malignant rumors by repeatedly showing your willingness to reconcile to the authority of those who have jurisdiction over the human intellect, in matters of the interpretation of Scripture. This document shows the true, unfiltered placement of clergymen towards scientists because unlike the Pope, Giovanni did not select to seem politically correct when writing to Galileo, he could genuinely speak his mind. Doc 3 also illustrates how religion, on a larger scale, could negatively affect and control the work of scientists. This train of control is depicted by scientists who still based science on r...

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.